of Marco Travaglio . Source: beppegrillo
Hello everyone, let's talk a bit 'of information so to speak about some issues of great contemporary relevance, we start with this epochal disaster in Japan, with the miseries of our opinion passed off as experts on the subject of Nuclear is not a expert, so I will not in any way going into technical details of what happened, find out what's going on that maybe in a few days about the Japanese nuclear power plants at risk defined by the same government that has drained vast areas surrounding and commenced operations of environmental decontamination and too many people on staff during the explosion, quell'emissione of clouds have been found in the area, we will see what has happened.
Supercazzole nuclear
The interesting thing is that before you even have the faintest idea what the cloud, some well-known opinion of anything, you are immediately taken care to let us know that nothing had happened, and indeed the sixth earthquake most devastating in human history, how they then say it is not known, has shown that nuclear power is safe.
fact is the safest sources of energy, Beppe Grillo on the site he has already had a number of supercazzole Fini, Casini, Prestigiacomo, but not limited to, those memorable excellent Chicco Testa, while there is that wonderful Umberto Veronesi " nuclear plants are safe, those who are against is still an old ideological mindset that is based on wrong assumptions, "congratulations, Valerio Rossi Albertini CNR" I would feel the radioactive leaks to exclude them, in the worst case the material is contaminated by radiation , but there will be a so-called Chernobyl effect, "Paul Clement to laboratory natural hazards Aeneas' safety systems are automatically turned off, as happened in Japan, only one in this mechanism did not work correctly, ops" the Italian government's position on nuclear is still what it is, is that you can not change your mind every minute, Fabrizio Ciccio "of course, when these have never changed my mind, a socialist who was london and is now with Berlusconi, one can not change idea every minute, and was at the bottom piduista piduista fact remains is the leader of the party founded by a piduista, too bad I can not find ... ah Chicco Testa called "jackals" who speaks to the escape of radiation from nuclear power plants in Japan.
"nuclear plants have cancer, have been shown to hold question-" is a huge tragedy, we saw many chemical and gas fire, I would say that when nuclear plants have taken, they hit right, you are automatically placed in a facility security and the only problem occurs due to lack of electricity, we will see in the coming days, but I'm confident "who was inspired by this tragedy to make controversy over nuclear power is a jackal, as we are front of one of the largest earthquakes world history, that speaks volumes about the level of certain politicians "and I think that says a lot even on the level of Head of course, was an environmentalist, even nuclear, and now has become a sponsor living, a man living the nuclear sandwich, but be careful because the best is yet to come, the better I'll leave you right at the back, we're almost better, Franco Battaglia expert, so these are always qualified teachers, this is the journal page. 8 Saturday "too many lies about nuclear power plants are safe" I can imagine when Japan was hit by the earthquake of 2007, the Republic with more than a little cynicism on the front page headline "Japan earthquake, radiation leak," and then adds that even Chernobyl was a joke, "Chernobyl was not no nightmare had it not been for those who have knowingly and culpably passed for such an event, even the most unfortunate occurred in the field of electricity production, has demonstrated unequivocally the absolute security "evidence that the Chernobyl nuclear power is safe, says expert battle and then adds," we will have occasion to speak of Chernobyl "because next month marks the 25th anniversary, and imagine with what already carnival, some , will remember the victims and therefore is like a carnival, laughter to remember Chernobyl, Chernobyl because it is evidence that nuclear power is safe, says expert Franco Battaglia.
understand that before these experts are also those who do not understand anything you hear expert, because no matter how inexperienced, will always be more experienced experts! Now says, let alone with this Japan, be stressed again, the Italian media for information, insist on the alert nuclear and probably will not fail to report a fire at a building housing a turbine at the power station of Onagawa and already not fail to report this fire, it would be better not to report it, but unfortunately we know how they are made these newspapers, these media, report the fire stations. You know how
done that when people see smoke come out from a central beat it, take it from becoming this emotion, from this irrational fear induced by these accursed media or induced also by what they see, you know how simple people, but Battle would was down there, he would made a SuperPI, a supersniffata, an aerosol, the fumenti would do with the smoke of the central Onagawa, but I suppose that was to leave out a turbine of a nuclear plant does not, I hope my mistakes assumptions but you check out the nuclear reactors are designed to automatically shut down the next seismic. It provides the expert
Battle "we alas experimental evidence that nuclear reactors are not safe, but pretty sure in order to fear earthquakes "of yesterday, however, is the one which occurred after 3 days ago still in the area of \u200b\u200bintensity 10 times greater than that of L'Aquila and of which Nobody has felt the need to notify anyone who had seen the consequences, although less nuclear power plants, we could say that we have enough elements to affirm that the population density and the seismic character of our region are being generous weak arguments to support opposition to the installation of nuclear reactors in our country? Maybe so, but it does not matter, the Italian media for information - but big word that's how you call it - will not stop those arguments to propose, I am sure, the provision of Battle under the title "too many lies about nuclear power plants are safe, they will let loose in describing the catastrophic doomsday scenarios but the truth is otherwise : plants Nipponese have held up well and remain a model for the whole world "I told you I would leave at the end of this little press release the best of the best because here we are dealing with an expert that the whole world envies us, even more Bertolaso \u200b\u200btitle of "safe nuclear, is proof of 9," also appeared on Saturday 12 of The Messenger, the journal of the Calton family, working developments in the field, it is always important to know who are the publishers of these newspapers, as well as in-law of Pier Ferdinando Casini, a major sponsor of the nuclear fact he has until recently urged the government to get busy in the construction of the famous 10 or 20 or 50 plants nuclear announced by Scajola and then mysteriously missing.
expert writes, "when we were the first news of the terrible earthquake that struck the north - eastern coast of Japan, here is that the sites and the Italian agencies have begun to spread the word on the alert nuclear However, if the state acts first thing we can say is that just the terrible intensity of the phenomenon that hit on Japan gives us a new confirmation that the safety of nuclear facilities, the progress made in recent decades have been impressive, such as to hold in reality without endangering environments and populations, the impact of their terribly out of scale events, such as that occurring and as such rules are built in accordance with which nuclear power plants today. Japan has 54 nuclear power plants according to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the central covering ¼ of the electricity needs of the country how can you check regularly, Japan is a country with more and more involved in the full transparency of this happens in its facilities, because of the high seismic risk of a substantial part of its territory is crossed by fault lines of tectonic plates, oceanic and continental made its facilities by adopting anti-earthquake standards ever higher in the decades and this is true and this is why procedures which the automatic shutdown of the reactors were suddenly turned into 4 stations in the north - east affected by the earthquake epicenter ocean, two other more distant, no later than 7 minutes and the block was placed in five other more distant in any event within 20 minutes of the Japanese authorities have ordered the detention of security for a full audit of the estate of each of the plants in Central Onagawa between 4 whose detention was automatic, it was immediately extinguished a fire caused by short circuits in a turbine is not inside the cooling circuit of the fissile material and therefore no release of hazardous waste. For another station, the closest to Fukushima to Sendai, which has hit the Tsunami has been prepared, however, the evacuation of the population within two miles radius, as required by the procedures in the case etc. Up to yesterday evening the Japanese have continued to confirm the Ia that no release of dangerous radioactive material was reported. The international media have amplified in other words without much understanding of the first notice issued from Tokyo about the state of nuclear emergency proclaimed by the Tokyo government had passed an hour before the event, is a standard security procedure for earthquakes above 5 on the Richter scale intensity and here we are at an intensity 8 / 9 of energy, literally frightening as documented by the images that we all have seen, we are talking about the seventh earthquakes ever to hit the world, we have tools to detect and historical sites, yet they held power, have proved very useful elections to learned more nuclear power plant operating at the world, the Kashiwazaki power over 8 etc. ..
Experts anything
The plant held, but in that case were the violent swinging to determine the spillage of 1.2 cubic meters of water from a swimming pool etc for fuel., we can draw three preliminary conclusions.
One of the reasons why nuclear power is its cost so much security, but as you can see is money well spent, the current safety standards in Europe are as strict as those Japan and Italy but has large areas of seismic phenomena are the magnitude of Japanese "is by touching when you read these things, watch yesterday on how many sites antinuclear Italian map of Italy on the overlap areas of seismic risk and even those at risk, groped to demonstrate that nuclear power can not afford it, it's just a demonstration of gross ignorance of technology.
If you look in the newspapers this morning, three days after the expected Battle of The Messenger that now I tell you who signed etc. You'll find titles like I'm talking about Il Corriere della Sera, a newspaper in favor of the return of nuclear emergency in 4 plants, the alarm for the overheated reactor is at risk of a merger has been extended. Provided another devastating quake in the next few hours - strange because in Italy we were told that earthquakes can not predict or even prevent - Doctor we are contaminated? Among the displaced people lined up for the test, now Japan fears the fallout, 4 nuclear power stations damaged, energy is rationed, a concrete wall against the risk of China syndrome, but the battle to stop the meltdown, nuclear emergencies, etc. risks are too high. "And then there's our government" no to emotional thoughts. "
Now I tell you who's the genius who wrote such beautiful things named "safe nuclear energy is proof of 9" this man is Oscar Giannino that many of you surely know why it is very present in the television and you recognize, respect other guests talk show to wear always put on colorful fire red, green pea, the lemon yellow, bright colors, stick in hand beard, mustache, balding, glasses ... Oscar Giannino.
One who wrote something like that so resoundingly rejected in the following days, I will not say who should go away, for heaven's sake, but for a few days hiding in the hope that no one notice that he was the one writing these things " safe nuclear energy is proof of the 9 "would be recommended but in Italy you know that nobody ever pays for that Smarronando ago, the forecasts are wrong, unpacked for analysis, but we must wonder how public opinion is oriented when those who should are informed of the level of those that I have just read, because there is only information subservient to politics, to the banks, there is also information on the most subordinate techniques which are those on which the man in the street, including myself of course, is lacking of information and therefore it is clear that it is on those matters that looks for the expert to get an idea.
Fortunately, not everyone is so of course, today there is a great piece of Sergio Rizzo Il Corriere della Sera, Sergio Rizzo explained that the problem here is not to say "nuclear power is not why it happened what happened in Japan "we must be honest and say that there are no safe nuclear power plants, then a nation of masochists or thrill-seekers or people who are tired of living, can also choose to fill their country's nuclear power plants, of course, the important thing is that we do not tell the joke of safe nuclear energy, nuclear modern, as modern is safe and secure than Japan is the most modern and most secure because the Japanese know them, it is never safe because of the nature reserves of surprises, sometimes good, sometimes bad, the speaker of safe nuclear energy or are very uninformed or very concerned or very concerned that his masters are naturally plunged all of the great business of procurement of nuclear and meanwhile, says Rizzo, 24 years after the 1987 referendum, where the Italians decided "enough nuclear, all parties said no to nuclear power, apart from the small Republican Party, the same socialists who are now in government with Berlusconi and tell us that we must turn to nuclear power, were opposed to nuclear energy, along with the Hammers and the radical environmentalists proposed a referendum against nuclear power, 24 years since that referendum was never presented a national energy plan and say to Italians as we think of food in the coming years as factories, trains and refrigerators, and recalls that in the meantime we have polluted the land to oil companies fill their pockets and then we realized, maybe going to the shows of Cricket that Germany produces 70 times more solar energy in Italy, although of course Germany has much less sunny Italy and when we ventured in the field of renewable energy that are not of course the only and ultimate solution to cover the needs, but they are one of the solutions that should be taken into consideration, we have turned into fraud (see the gigantic fraud of wind) from this point of view, we are at the forefront of misinformation and contradictory nature of the conduct of our policy, while continuing to argue for nuclear, not nuclear, without telling the people that nuclear power, even if he came back in Italy, will see him again some twenty years, given that both the time taken for identify the sites, build power plants, if it was that they are money, when we will probably all over the world will be redirected to other energy sources and more modern ones, yes, much more safe or less insecure.
the natural question is: how does public opinion to form an informed opinion, when those who should help are the level that we saw earlier.
Supercazzole School
Same thing happens naturally every day on everything that we need to know and understand in order to get an idea and form an opinion, the misleading titles of newspapers, messages that come constantly in the newspapers and especially television, Giuliano Ferrara returns tonight, about misleading messages, chase and chase and has become virtually impossible to fight them all because they are too.
There is an impressive volume of fire, just think of poor Santoro who sees that some people are taking pictures inside the house, he tells these guys to leave and they go to these newspapers to complain of being civil protection, as if the Civil Protection had the task of photographing the inside of private homes, and yet the newspapers, I really liked a title simply amazing Il Corriere della Sera said "men Santoro exchanges of civil protection for photographers, but if you see one with a camera you photograph inside your property, what does it mean that the trade for a photographer? It 'obvious that if the camera is photographing and inside your home is a photographer! Or some other titles like today of course that takes a lot of nonsense spoken by Maria Stella Gelmini last night at that time, he does, "the left goes to the streets to the public school but send their children to private" I do not know if you noticed the absolute crap that is in this concept, this poor, we are talking about one that is due to go to become a lawyer to take the exam in Reggio Calabria, being evidently in anticipation of Brescia in Brescia knowing that they would not have promoted and otherwise should explain what is so merit, because you heard last night that said the 68th, enough of egalitarianism, the six political, do not know where the policy 6 of 68 in 2011, but she is convinced that there is 68 at this time in Italy, and then people do the collective degrees, gets the political etc 6. said "enough, meritocracy" was interesting that someone did of applications, particularly in its examination State Reggio Calabria, to understand what is merit in going to Calabria for a test that you should give your house in Brescia!
in Calabria to give an exam that you should give your house Brescia! icle on his state examination in Reggio Calabria, perPensate the bullshit to say that there are people who send their children to private school and then appears to the public school and you see a contradiction in this, we are talking about an absolute idiot if could be raised trains, trams, metros, there would be protests, why? Because it is simply absurd to deny public transport to people, then one says: ah, but because you posters in favor of the train if we go by car? I'm in the car because I do what I want, then I support the train, taxi, subway ... what do you mean? One only because it is not favorable to the train or bus can take the car? Rightly was timely objection Fabio Fazio recalled that a sentence of young men, who, it seems like a genius compared to Gelmini said "I support public water although I'm going to buy mineral water" is not that the government can afford to poison the water in the taps of citizens to force them to buy mineral water, then there are those who are in favor public water and then you buy bottled water, but will his cock, I can not express to the public school and then send my son wherever I want? I send my son wherever I want, but if the school did shit, I would send them to private school and I would fight for a public school that no longer sucks, but what it means, there is no contradiction, there are a lot of people who were in favor of divorce and why they divorced, is one thing to the right of people to divorce, another thing is that then you're forced to divorce because you were favorable to the divorce, but let the numbers? To tell you what goes in the empty heads of these ministers and the newspapers that go back, instead of analyzing the clinical point of view.
Supercazzole judicial
conclude but we have already spoken several times with all the input we receive regarding the reform of justice
Yesterday I heard Mr Alfano who was on television networks and then it was unified dall'Annunziata to seven in the evening, say major shit, like for example that in 1987 became a referendum on the civil liability of judges because the judges are when they are wrong pay out of their pockets, such as doctors, as the surgeons who make mistakes, while in 1987 the referendum on the civil liability of judges, which passed, was combined with a package of others including the referendum that abolished the nuclear, then a government that if not care about the referendum of 1987 in the nuclear and pulls straight on the reintroduction of nuclear energy without asking Italians in the meantime have changed their minds, it is curious that wave O'er the 1987 referendum only with regard to the civil liability of judges, but be careful because if you see the polls you find that two Italians are in favor of over 3 Alfano part of the reform that makes the judges personally pay their errors, because many people think that judges today do not pay for their mistakes, or for their crimes, because they are telling us for years that there is a CSM, the self-governing body that judges the judges, the judges then judge for themselves, they always perform, are square make the corporation, are chaste and so it is time to stop.
The citizen victim of miscarriage of justice must be able to sue the judge who gave him an injustice, abuse and obtain from him personally compensation, just as a citizen when he goes for an operation, if the doctor misses this, the citizen has the right to denounce and to retaliate against him, that's what they tell us, in language that a lot of power, says: put me in jail, had nothing to do, he must pay for this then get polls favorable to this kind of reform. It is believed, that the judges did not want to pay for their mistakes, do not pay for their mistakes and that the referendum of 1987, radicals and socialists who wanted to force them to finally pay for their mistakes, has been betrayed and rejected by lobby of the courts that forced the politicians not to pay the judges their mistakes and then maybe you the case of telling it like it is.
not true at all what was said, the referendum of 1987 provided for the civil liability of judges when they are wrong intentionally or by gross negligence, willful misconduct do you mean? What did you do it on purpose to make mistakes, serious fault is it? What you did on purpose because you have taken all precautions, you missed your duties seriously because, without wanting to do an injustice to the defendant or another suspect, but have not taken all precautions to avoid it and this is misconduct, negligence is your mistake, not intentional, not intentional but it is your responsibility because it was for you to avoid to make that mistake, doing better investigations, better read the cards, etc capendole better. and then said that the referendum, we need a third party liability, should the victims be compensated error in the calendar year, the referendum is not was not betrayed, was signed into law by then the majority who were penta, Christian Democrats and Socialists who had promoted the referendum and the other to the following effect: the citizen who allegedly suffered a miscarriage of justice may sue the state, if the state loses the case compensate the citizen who was killed in error, then whether that error depends on willful misconduct or gross negligence by the judge or judges, could be the 5 of the Supreme Court, the three Court of Appeal or the judge if it is a single PM, GIP, Gup, what is the state rivals on the court or the courts to pay them for the loss that has advance the state a citizen of the victim, this is the law today, the fact that the state then it is inefficient not forget to bring to account those judges who make mistakes, it is not required by law, is due to the fact that the state is inefficient.
Why should the State in the first instance to pay damages to the citizen victim of miscarriage of justice? Because the judge is a professional mica, mica is a free professional, acting on his own? The magistrate is the State, the prosecutor called because it is the public prosecutor represents the state institution, is justice, not the prosecutor Tom, Dick or Harry, the prosecutor puts on the robe because at that time is not him, then did it justice, the State, is the prosecution! The court idem, it's not making judgments as to Marco Travaglio or foo, it is justice that he performs his duties, then in the name of the state, which is why there should never be discussion between the public interest is that represented by the PM and the judge and the Advocate, which is instead a private party is representing the victims, the civil party, is representing the accused ol'indagato, they represent clients who pay them, the prosecutor and the judge represent all of us, a general interest in the State.
However, if the judge is wrong intentionally or by gross negligence, the State must call to pay because he has done damage to the victim or miscarriage of justice, both at the whole community, has even ruined the good name of the state, the magistrate who especially one that should not stop stop, especially one that should not intercept intercepts, specifically a conviction that he knows is innocent or that an indictment be innocent or research, search, she attacked one he knows to be innocent, or who is so incompetent, grossly negligent, that makes all this damage because it is not good at doing his job, it is obvious that the state must retaliate against him and must pay him the money of his errors and now the law allows this to happen, provides that from happening, just after the referendum of 24 years ago, why can not today be the citizen who feels the victim of a miscarriage of justice to report directly to the Magistrate that he claims have made him the damage? Because the magistrate can not be daily complaints from a citizen for what he has done in carrying out its duties, the judge must decide, said the Latins, without hopes to benefit from what he does and without fear of retaliation for what he does, must have no expectation, either positive or negative, why? Why else is not free to decide according to law and according to his conscience, if you know that tomorrow and the day after an arrest that you may withdraw in person, if that someone is a poor man you have to stop the arrests the same, but if that someone you have stop is a powerful, think three times before stopping, instead you should simply consider whether there are grounds to arrest him or not, without fear of complaints, or if you do it without hope of favor or applause or gifts if you do not do, that's why there must be the rule in the middle.
And 'the State which accepts complaints, pay any damage and if the damage was created by a judge who failed to intent and gross negligence, calls him a reply, but it's true today, what will change in future? That directly and personally accused ol'indagato think they have suffered a miscarriage of justice, the judge may terminate, personally.
know that the magistrate is not a surgeon or a doctor or a carpenter or a plumber, if the plumber at my house to fix the sink and it devastates me, ask him any damage if I go by the surgeon to make me work and what I ruin, I ask him the damage, but I do not go to the magistrate to ask him to trial, I did not choose the judge, while I choose the surgeon, the electrician, the plumber, the carpenter, etc. ..
The surgeon and the doctor have a duty to save my life, have the task of improving health, to get back healthy, the Magistrate has no responsibility other than to, in determining whether a criminal has committed a crime or not, in state in a civil dispute between two parties, who's right and who's wrong, think about how it is different: the doctor who does his job well gives great satisfaction to his patient, saves his life, back to health, ' plumber who does his job well, gives great satisfaction to his client, why? Why not tap it worked and now works as an electrician if he does his job well gives great satisfaction to the customer who is paying, why? Why do not we first saw it, was dark and now turns on the light, the carpenter who does his job well because it gives great satisfaction? Because I needed a library and see what a beautiful library I did, I pay them for this, I have chosen them getting information and I've paid for doing a good thing that I need, the court did not choose, do not pay and is not particularly there to give satisfaction, it is there to do that justice is a different thing, the judge usually creates more enemies, is an inevitable consequence of his craft create enemies, do you think the civil court that adjudicates the dispute, lite of the building, the border dispute, the dispute between debtor and creditor, there are two parties who both said to be right and ask the judge to give it to him, the court can not give reason to you both and can not even say: not quite right either, to say that he is right to force one or the other is right, then surely one of the discontented and certainly one of them the next day and one of them angry if they can certainly do so, the complaint , saying I was right and you gave another reason!
Idem in Criminal Matters, which is not a citizen before the PM so happens to sport, because the PM wants to look at it, if one happens before a judge or a PM is because there is a complaint, is suspected of having committed a crime, then when you meet a PM is not you say "I hope you have a good operation, I hope you have a good library, a good electrical system, we hope that save my life "you're not you're going to ask for a service to him, is he who called you because you are suspected of a crime, then obviously that has not become a friend of the PM, your only hope is that the PM face justice and that if his investigation is done well, the process is done well, the preliminary hearing is done well in the various levels of courts, you finally have justice if you are convicted guilty, if you are innocent, acquitted ditto if you are a victim of a crime and go to the report, go to denounce, not the PM choose, make the complaint, the investigation ends, however, is a guy that PM is the PM's office, representing the state and then if it is true that you have suffered the crime and you will find the evidence to condemn what you did wrong, if you do not find the evidence or if it is you were wrong, then the person you have complained will be paid, then a two- you feel angry if the victim and the judiciary can not give you justice, or states that you are not a victim, and two if you get angry you suspect is convicted and then, even if you get too angry you suspect is acquitted, then why do you still have kept in a water bath for a while 'time. The court will always have enemies, it is inevitable to have enemies, you paid mail to call people to respond to crime in the criminal and civil wrong and a right to give to another, then still decides scontenterà always someone in criminal or unhappy or dissatisfied with the victim the defendant in a civil or unhappy or dissatisfied with the other hand, imagine if the parties are unhappy that they could terminate the day after the single judge, the judges for not having trouble simply would not be anything , would not take no further action that is the judiciary that we want?
see how easy it is to influence people, the judge was wrong pay is already so, it is right now is to pay the State and then in the case where the court has fraudulently or negligently and grossly wrong, then make him pay the damages, but never allow the private citizen to sue the judge because otherwise the courts to avoid complaints and troubles, as do thousands and thousands of trials, they would have thousands and thousands of complaints, no one wants to have thousands and thousands of complaints, just would not do anything!
E 'this is the justice we want? Just know that, unfortunately, to know you can not figure it out watching some TV or reading newspapers, we need to deepen and not always those delegated to the deepening know what they're talking about, so that even the easiest thing, which seems more common sense, the judge who pays wrong, in fact conceals a propaganda that is difficult to remove because it takes longer, is a complex problem and can not be compressed in a television broadcast or a newspaper, always be wary of anything that seems simple, when you say that there is a simple thing, try to get you to see what's behind it, we develop a bit 'of critical spirit and above all learn to choose the experts who truly are and are not servants of someone, spread the word and good week
Supercazzole nuclear
The interesting thing is that before you even have the faintest idea what the cloud, some well-known opinion of anything, you are immediately taken care to let us know that nothing had happened, and indeed the sixth earthquake most devastating in human history, how they then say it is not known, has shown that nuclear power is safe.
fact is the safest sources of energy, Beppe Grillo on the site he has already had a number of supercazzole Fini, Casini, Prestigiacomo, but not limited to, those memorable excellent Chicco Testa, while there is that wonderful Umberto Veronesi " nuclear plants are safe, those who are against is still an old ideological mindset that is based on wrong assumptions, "congratulations, Valerio Rossi Albertini CNR" I would feel the radioactive leaks to exclude them, in the worst case the material is contaminated by radiation , but there will be a so-called Chernobyl effect, "Paul Clement to laboratory natural hazards Aeneas' safety systems are automatically turned off, as happened in Japan, only one in this mechanism did not work correctly, ops" the Italian government's position on nuclear is still what it is, is that you can not change your mind every minute, Fabrizio Ciccio "of course, when these have never changed my mind, a socialist who was london and is now with Berlusconi, one can not change idea every minute, and was at the bottom piduista piduista fact remains is the leader of the party founded by a piduista, too bad I can not find ... ah Chicco Testa called "jackals" who speaks to the escape of radiation from nuclear power plants in Japan.
"nuclear plants have cancer, have been shown to hold question-" is a huge tragedy, we saw many chemical and gas fire, I would say that when nuclear plants have taken, they hit right, you are automatically placed in a facility security and the only problem occurs due to lack of electricity, we will see in the coming days, but I'm confident "who was inspired by this tragedy to make controversy over nuclear power is a jackal, as we are front of one of the largest earthquakes world history, that speaks volumes about the level of certain politicians "and I think that says a lot even on the level of Head of course, was an environmentalist, even nuclear, and now has become a sponsor living, a man living the nuclear sandwich, but be careful because the best is yet to come, the better I'll leave you right at the back, we're almost better, Franco Battaglia expert, so these are always qualified teachers, this is the journal page. 8 Saturday "too many lies about nuclear power plants are safe" I can imagine when Japan was hit by the earthquake of 2007, the Republic with more than a little cynicism on the front page headline "Japan earthquake, radiation leak," and then adds that even Chernobyl was a joke, "Chernobyl was not no nightmare had it not been for those who have knowingly and culpably passed for such an event, even the most unfortunate occurred in the field of electricity production, has demonstrated unequivocally the absolute security "evidence that the Chernobyl nuclear power is safe, says expert battle and then adds," we will have occasion to speak of Chernobyl "because next month marks the 25th anniversary, and imagine with what already carnival, some , will remember the victims and therefore is like a carnival, laughter to remember Chernobyl, Chernobyl because it is evidence that nuclear power is safe, says expert Franco Battaglia.
understand that before these experts are also those who do not understand anything you hear expert, because no matter how inexperienced, will always be more experienced experts! Now says, let alone with this Japan, be stressed again, the Italian media for information, insist on the alert nuclear and probably will not fail to report a fire at a building housing a turbine at the power station of Onagawa and already not fail to report this fire, it would be better not to report it, but unfortunately we know how they are made these newspapers, these media, report the fire stations. You know how
done that when people see smoke come out from a central beat it, take it from becoming this emotion, from this irrational fear induced by these accursed media or induced also by what they see, you know how simple people, but Battle would was down there, he would made a SuperPI, a supersniffata, an aerosol, the fumenti would do with the smoke of the central Onagawa, but I suppose that was to leave out a turbine of a nuclear plant does not, I hope my mistakes assumptions but you check out the nuclear reactors are designed to automatically shut down the next seismic. It provides the expert
Battle "we alas experimental evidence that nuclear reactors are not safe, but pretty sure in order to fear earthquakes "of yesterday, however, is the one which occurred after 3 days ago still in the area of \u200b\u200bintensity 10 times greater than that of L'Aquila and of which Nobody has felt the need to notify anyone who had seen the consequences, although less nuclear power plants, we could say that we have enough elements to affirm that the population density and the seismic character of our region are being generous weak arguments to support opposition to the installation of nuclear reactors in our country? Maybe so, but it does not matter, the Italian media for information - but big word that's how you call it - will not stop those arguments to propose, I am sure, the provision of Battle under the title "too many lies about nuclear power plants are safe, they will let loose in describing the catastrophic doomsday scenarios but the truth is otherwise : plants Nipponese have held up well and remain a model for the whole world "I told you I would leave at the end of this little press release the best of the best because here we are dealing with an expert that the whole world envies us, even more Bertolaso \u200b\u200btitle of "safe nuclear, is proof of 9," also appeared on Saturday 12 of The Messenger, the journal of the Calton family, working developments in the field, it is always important to know who are the publishers of these newspapers, as well as in-law of Pier Ferdinando Casini, a major sponsor of the nuclear fact he has until recently urged the government to get busy in the construction of the famous 10 or 20 or 50 plants nuclear announced by Scajola and then mysteriously missing.
expert writes, "when we were the first news of the terrible earthquake that struck the north - eastern coast of Japan, here is that the sites and the Italian agencies have begun to spread the word on the alert nuclear However, if the state acts first thing we can say is that just the terrible intensity of the phenomenon that hit on Japan gives us a new confirmation that the safety of nuclear facilities, the progress made in recent decades have been impressive, such as to hold in reality without endangering environments and populations, the impact of their terribly out of scale events, such as that occurring and as such rules are built in accordance with which nuclear power plants today. Japan has 54 nuclear power plants according to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the central covering ¼ of the electricity needs of the country how can you check regularly, Japan is a country with more and more involved in the full transparency of this happens in its facilities, because of the high seismic risk of a substantial part of its territory is crossed by fault lines of tectonic plates, oceanic and continental made its facilities by adopting anti-earthquake standards ever higher in the decades and this is true and this is why procedures which the automatic shutdown of the reactors were suddenly turned into 4 stations in the north - east affected by the earthquake epicenter ocean, two other more distant, no later than 7 minutes and the block was placed in five other more distant in any event within 20 minutes of the Japanese authorities have ordered the detention of security for a full audit of the estate of each of the plants in Central Onagawa between 4 whose detention was automatic, it was immediately extinguished a fire caused by short circuits in a turbine is not inside the cooling circuit of the fissile material and therefore no release of hazardous waste. For another station, the closest to Fukushima to Sendai, which has hit the Tsunami has been prepared, however, the evacuation of the population within two miles radius, as required by the procedures in the case etc. Up to yesterday evening the Japanese have continued to confirm the Ia that no release of dangerous radioactive material was reported. The international media have amplified in other words without much understanding of the first notice issued from Tokyo about the state of nuclear emergency proclaimed by the Tokyo government had passed an hour before the event, is a standard security procedure for earthquakes above 5 on the Richter scale intensity and here we are at an intensity 8 / 9 of energy, literally frightening as documented by the images that we all have seen, we are talking about the seventh earthquakes ever to hit the world, we have tools to detect and historical sites, yet they held power, have proved very useful elections to learned more nuclear power plant operating at the world, the Kashiwazaki power over 8 etc. ..
Experts anything
The plant held, but in that case were the violent swinging to determine the spillage of 1.2 cubic meters of water from a swimming pool etc for fuel., we can draw three preliminary conclusions.
One of the reasons why nuclear power is its cost so much security, but as you can see is money well spent, the current safety standards in Europe are as strict as those Japan and Italy but has large areas of seismic phenomena are the magnitude of Japanese "is by touching when you read these things, watch yesterday on how many sites antinuclear Italian map of Italy on the overlap areas of seismic risk and even those at risk, groped to demonstrate that nuclear power can not afford it, it's just a demonstration of gross ignorance of technology.
If you look in the newspapers this morning, three days after the expected Battle of The Messenger that now I tell you who signed etc. You'll find titles like I'm talking about Il Corriere della Sera, a newspaper in favor of the return of nuclear emergency in 4 plants, the alarm for the overheated reactor is at risk of a merger has been extended. Provided another devastating quake in the next few hours - strange because in Italy we were told that earthquakes can not predict or even prevent - Doctor we are contaminated? Among the displaced people lined up for the test, now Japan fears the fallout, 4 nuclear power stations damaged, energy is rationed, a concrete wall against the risk of China syndrome, but the battle to stop the meltdown, nuclear emergencies, etc. risks are too high. "And then there's our government" no to emotional thoughts. "
Now I tell you who's the genius who wrote such beautiful things named "safe nuclear energy is proof of 9" this man is Oscar Giannino that many of you surely know why it is very present in the television and you recognize, respect other guests talk show to wear always put on colorful fire red, green pea, the lemon yellow, bright colors, stick in hand beard, mustache, balding, glasses ... Oscar Giannino.
One who wrote something like that so resoundingly rejected in the following days, I will not say who should go away, for heaven's sake, but for a few days hiding in the hope that no one notice that he was the one writing these things " safe nuclear energy is proof of the 9 "would be recommended but in Italy you know that nobody ever pays for that Smarronando ago, the forecasts are wrong, unpacked for analysis, but we must wonder how public opinion is oriented when those who should are informed of the level of those that I have just read, because there is only information subservient to politics, to the banks, there is also information on the most subordinate techniques which are those on which the man in the street, including myself of course, is lacking of information and therefore it is clear that it is on those matters that looks for the expert to get an idea.
Fortunately, not everyone is so of course, today there is a great piece of Sergio Rizzo Il Corriere della Sera, Sergio Rizzo explained that the problem here is not to say "nuclear power is not why it happened what happened in Japan "we must be honest and say that there are no safe nuclear power plants, then a nation of masochists or thrill-seekers or people who are tired of living, can also choose to fill their country's nuclear power plants, of course, the important thing is that we do not tell the joke of safe nuclear energy, nuclear modern, as modern is safe and secure than Japan is the most modern and most secure because the Japanese know them, it is never safe because of the nature reserves of surprises, sometimes good, sometimes bad, the speaker of safe nuclear energy or are very uninformed or very concerned or very concerned that his masters are naturally plunged all of the great business of procurement of nuclear and meanwhile, says Rizzo, 24 years after the 1987 referendum, where the Italians decided "enough nuclear, all parties said no to nuclear power, apart from the small Republican Party, the same socialists who are now in government with Berlusconi and tell us that we must turn to nuclear power, were opposed to nuclear energy, along with the Hammers and the radical environmentalists proposed a referendum against nuclear power, 24 years since that referendum was never presented a national energy plan and say to Italians as we think of food in the coming years as factories, trains and refrigerators, and recalls that in the meantime we have polluted the land to oil companies fill their pockets and then we realized, maybe going to the shows of Cricket that Germany produces 70 times more solar energy in Italy, although of course Germany has much less sunny Italy and when we ventured in the field of renewable energy that are not of course the only and ultimate solution to cover the needs, but they are one of the solutions that should be taken into consideration, we have turned into fraud (see the gigantic fraud of wind) from this point of view, we are at the forefront of misinformation and contradictory nature of the conduct of our policy, while continuing to argue for nuclear, not nuclear, without telling the people that nuclear power, even if he came back in Italy, will see him again some twenty years, given that both the time taken for identify the sites, build power plants, if it was that they are money, when we will probably all over the world will be redirected to other energy sources and more modern ones, yes, much more safe or less insecure.
the natural question is: how does public opinion to form an informed opinion, when those who should help are the level that we saw earlier.
Supercazzole School
Same thing happens naturally every day on everything that we need to know and understand in order to get an idea and form an opinion, the misleading titles of newspapers, messages that come constantly in the newspapers and especially television, Giuliano Ferrara returns tonight, about misleading messages, chase and chase and has become virtually impossible to fight them all because they are too.
There is an impressive volume of fire, just think of poor Santoro who sees that some people are taking pictures inside the house, he tells these guys to leave and they go to these newspapers to complain of being civil protection, as if the Civil Protection had the task of photographing the inside of private homes, and yet the newspapers, I really liked a title simply amazing Il Corriere della Sera said "men Santoro exchanges of civil protection for photographers, but if you see one with a camera you photograph inside your property, what does it mean that the trade for a photographer? It 'obvious that if the camera is photographing and inside your home is a photographer! Or some other titles like today of course that takes a lot of nonsense spoken by Maria Stella Gelmini last night at that time, he does, "the left goes to the streets to the public school but send their children to private" I do not know if you noticed the absolute crap that is in this concept, this poor, we are talking about one that is due to go to become a lawyer to take the exam in Reggio Calabria, being evidently in anticipation of Brescia in Brescia knowing that they would not have promoted and otherwise should explain what is so merit, because you heard last night that said the 68th, enough of egalitarianism, the six political, do not know where the policy 6 of 68 in 2011, but she is convinced that there is 68 at this time in Italy, and then people do the collective degrees, gets the political etc 6. said "enough, meritocracy" was interesting that someone did of applications, particularly in its examination State Reggio Calabria, to understand what is merit in going to Calabria for a test that you should give your house in Brescia!
in Calabria to give an exam that you should give your house Brescia! icle on his state examination in Reggio Calabria, perPensate the bullshit to say that there are people who send their children to private school and then appears to the public school and you see a contradiction in this, we are talking about an absolute idiot if could be raised trains, trams, metros, there would be protests, why? Because it is simply absurd to deny public transport to people, then one says: ah, but because you posters in favor of the train if we go by car? I'm in the car because I do what I want, then I support the train, taxi, subway ... what do you mean? One only because it is not favorable to the train or bus can take the car? Rightly was timely objection Fabio Fazio recalled that a sentence of young men, who, it seems like a genius compared to Gelmini said "I support public water although I'm going to buy mineral water" is not that the government can afford to poison the water in the taps of citizens to force them to buy mineral water, then there are those who are in favor public water and then you buy bottled water, but will his cock, I can not express to the public school and then send my son wherever I want? I send my son wherever I want, but if the school did shit, I would send them to private school and I would fight for a public school that no longer sucks, but what it means, there is no contradiction, there are a lot of people who were in favor of divorce and why they divorced, is one thing to the right of people to divorce, another thing is that then you're forced to divorce because you were favorable to the divorce, but let the numbers? To tell you what goes in the empty heads of these ministers and the newspapers that go back, instead of analyzing the clinical point of view.
Supercazzole judicial
conclude but we have already spoken several times with all the input we receive regarding the reform of justice
Yesterday I heard Mr Alfano who was on television networks and then it was unified dall'Annunziata to seven in the evening, say major shit, like for example that in 1987 became a referendum on the civil liability of judges because the judges are when they are wrong pay out of their pockets, such as doctors, as the surgeons who make mistakes, while in 1987 the referendum on the civil liability of judges, which passed, was combined with a package of others including the referendum that abolished the nuclear, then a government that if not care about the referendum of 1987 in the nuclear and pulls straight on the reintroduction of nuclear energy without asking Italians in the meantime have changed their minds, it is curious that wave O'er the 1987 referendum only with regard to the civil liability of judges, but be careful because if you see the polls you find that two Italians are in favor of over 3 Alfano part of the reform that makes the judges personally pay their errors, because many people think that judges today do not pay for their mistakes, or for their crimes, because they are telling us for years that there is a CSM, the self-governing body that judges the judges, the judges then judge for themselves, they always perform, are square make the corporation, are chaste and so it is time to stop.
The citizen victim of miscarriage of justice must be able to sue the judge who gave him an injustice, abuse and obtain from him personally compensation, just as a citizen when he goes for an operation, if the doctor misses this, the citizen has the right to denounce and to retaliate against him, that's what they tell us, in language that a lot of power, says: put me in jail, had nothing to do, he must pay for this then get polls favorable to this kind of reform. It is believed, that the judges did not want to pay for their mistakes, do not pay for their mistakes and that the referendum of 1987, radicals and socialists who wanted to force them to finally pay for their mistakes, has been betrayed and rejected by lobby of the courts that forced the politicians not to pay the judges their mistakes and then maybe you the case of telling it like it is.
not true at all what was said, the referendum of 1987 provided for the civil liability of judges when they are wrong intentionally or by gross negligence, willful misconduct do you mean? What did you do it on purpose to make mistakes, serious fault is it? What you did on purpose because you have taken all precautions, you missed your duties seriously because, without wanting to do an injustice to the defendant or another suspect, but have not taken all precautions to avoid it and this is misconduct, negligence is your mistake, not intentional, not intentional but it is your responsibility because it was for you to avoid to make that mistake, doing better investigations, better read the cards, etc capendole better. and then said that the referendum, we need a third party liability, should the victims be compensated error in the calendar year, the referendum is not was not betrayed, was signed into law by then the majority who were penta, Christian Democrats and Socialists who had promoted the referendum and the other to the following effect: the citizen who allegedly suffered a miscarriage of justice may sue the state, if the state loses the case compensate the citizen who was killed in error, then whether that error depends on willful misconduct or gross negligence by the judge or judges, could be the 5 of the Supreme Court, the three Court of Appeal or the judge if it is a single PM, GIP, Gup, what is the state rivals on the court or the courts to pay them for the loss that has advance the state a citizen of the victim, this is the law today, the fact that the state then it is inefficient not forget to bring to account those judges who make mistakes, it is not required by law, is due to the fact that the state is inefficient.
Why should the State in the first instance to pay damages to the citizen victim of miscarriage of justice? Because the judge is a professional mica, mica is a free professional, acting on his own? The magistrate is the State, the prosecutor called because it is the public prosecutor represents the state institution, is justice, not the prosecutor Tom, Dick or Harry, the prosecutor puts on the robe because at that time is not him, then did it justice, the State, is the prosecution! The court idem, it's not making judgments as to Marco Travaglio or foo, it is justice that he performs his duties, then in the name of the state, which is why there should never be discussion between the public interest is that represented by the PM and the judge and the Advocate, which is instead a private party is representing the victims, the civil party, is representing the accused ol'indagato, they represent clients who pay them, the prosecutor and the judge represent all of us, a general interest in the State.
However, if the judge is wrong intentionally or by gross negligence, the State must call to pay because he has done damage to the victim or miscarriage of justice, both at the whole community, has even ruined the good name of the state, the magistrate who especially one that should not stop stop, especially one that should not intercept intercepts, specifically a conviction that he knows is innocent or that an indictment be innocent or research, search, she attacked one he knows to be innocent, or who is so incompetent, grossly negligent, that makes all this damage because it is not good at doing his job, it is obvious that the state must retaliate against him and must pay him the money of his errors and now the law allows this to happen, provides that from happening, just after the referendum of 24 years ago, why can not today be the citizen who feels the victim of a miscarriage of justice to report directly to the Magistrate that he claims have made him the damage? Because the magistrate can not be daily complaints from a citizen for what he has done in carrying out its duties, the judge must decide, said the Latins, without hopes to benefit from what he does and without fear of retaliation for what he does, must have no expectation, either positive or negative, why? Why else is not free to decide according to law and according to his conscience, if you know that tomorrow and the day after an arrest that you may withdraw in person, if that someone is a poor man you have to stop the arrests the same, but if that someone you have stop is a powerful, think three times before stopping, instead you should simply consider whether there are grounds to arrest him or not, without fear of complaints, or if you do it without hope of favor or applause or gifts if you do not do, that's why there must be the rule in the middle.
And 'the State which accepts complaints, pay any damage and if the damage was created by a judge who failed to intent and gross negligence, calls him a reply, but it's true today, what will change in future? That directly and personally accused ol'indagato think they have suffered a miscarriage of justice, the judge may terminate, personally.
know that the magistrate is not a surgeon or a doctor or a carpenter or a plumber, if the plumber at my house to fix the sink and it devastates me, ask him any damage if I go by the surgeon to make me work and what I ruin, I ask him the damage, but I do not go to the magistrate to ask him to trial, I did not choose the judge, while I choose the surgeon, the electrician, the plumber, the carpenter, etc. ..
The surgeon and the doctor have a duty to save my life, have the task of improving health, to get back healthy, the Magistrate has no responsibility other than to, in determining whether a criminal has committed a crime or not, in state in a civil dispute between two parties, who's right and who's wrong, think about how it is different: the doctor who does his job well gives great satisfaction to his patient, saves his life, back to health, ' plumber who does his job well, gives great satisfaction to his client, why? Why not tap it worked and now works as an electrician if he does his job well gives great satisfaction to the customer who is paying, why? Why do not we first saw it, was dark and now turns on the light, the carpenter who does his job well because it gives great satisfaction? Because I needed a library and see what a beautiful library I did, I pay them for this, I have chosen them getting information and I've paid for doing a good thing that I need, the court did not choose, do not pay and is not particularly there to give satisfaction, it is there to do that justice is a different thing, the judge usually creates more enemies, is an inevitable consequence of his craft create enemies, do you think the civil court that adjudicates the dispute, lite of the building, the border dispute, the dispute between debtor and creditor, there are two parties who both said to be right and ask the judge to give it to him, the court can not give reason to you both and can not even say: not quite right either, to say that he is right to force one or the other is right, then surely one of the discontented and certainly one of them the next day and one of them angry if they can certainly do so, the complaint , saying I was right and you gave another reason!
Idem in Criminal Matters, which is not a citizen before the PM so happens to sport, because the PM wants to look at it, if one happens before a judge or a PM is because there is a complaint, is suspected of having committed a crime, then when you meet a PM is not you say "I hope you have a good operation, I hope you have a good library, a good electrical system, we hope that save my life "you're not you're going to ask for a service to him, is he who called you because you are suspected of a crime, then obviously that has not become a friend of the PM, your only hope is that the PM face justice and that if his investigation is done well, the process is done well, the preliminary hearing is done well in the various levels of courts, you finally have justice if you are convicted guilty, if you are innocent, acquitted ditto if you are a victim of a crime and go to the report, go to denounce, not the PM choose, make the complaint, the investigation ends, however, is a guy that PM is the PM's office, representing the state and then if it is true that you have suffered the crime and you will find the evidence to condemn what you did wrong, if you do not find the evidence or if it is you were wrong, then the person you have complained will be paid, then a two- you feel angry if the victim and the judiciary can not give you justice, or states that you are not a victim, and two if you get angry you suspect is convicted and then, even if you get too angry you suspect is acquitted, then why do you still have kept in a water bath for a while 'time. The court will always have enemies, it is inevitable to have enemies, you paid mail to call people to respond to crime in the criminal and civil wrong and a right to give to another, then still decides scontenterà always someone in criminal or unhappy or dissatisfied with the victim the defendant in a civil or unhappy or dissatisfied with the other hand, imagine if the parties are unhappy that they could terminate the day after the single judge, the judges for not having trouble simply would not be anything , would not take no further action that is the judiciary that we want?
see how easy it is to influence people, the judge was wrong pay is already so, it is right now is to pay the State and then in the case where the court has fraudulently or negligently and grossly wrong, then make him pay the damages, but never allow the private citizen to sue the judge because otherwise the courts to avoid complaints and troubles, as do thousands and thousands of trials, they would have thousands and thousands of complaints, no one wants to have thousands and thousands of complaints, just would not do anything!
E 'this is the justice we want? Just know that, unfortunately, to know you can not figure it out watching some TV or reading newspapers, we need to deepen and not always those delegated to the deepening know what they're talking about, so that even the easiest thing, which seems more common sense, the judge who pays wrong, in fact conceals a propaganda that is difficult to remove because it takes longer, is a complex problem and can not be compressed in a television broadcast or a newspaper, always be wary of anything that seems simple, when you say that there is a simple thing, try to get you to see what's behind it, we develop a bit 'of critical spirit and above all learn to choose the experts who truly are and are not servants of someone, spread the word and good week
0 comments:
Post a Comment